I'm finally here again, sorry but as always happens to me I open my blogspot page, then I get distracted and do not write anything .. so I have not written anything all the things I do ("Tunne is' too! "by mom) and that above all I want to share with others and still have a lot of work to do with this blog. But I do not give and I will yield to the call of "hard core"!
I named this new (and anticipated) post "... food for thought" why, studying Anatomy II, the absurd boredom of the arterial system in particular, came to my mind a speech that surely our beloved prof. Gulisano has done with a pipe last year and this year we are proposing, day after day, directly and indirectly, with lessons on the nervous system: two words in the lexicon history, that the whole affair so plan We plan medical students, willy-nilly, we must one learn a new vocabulary of the Italian language, yes, but in medical and scientific. Affectionately call it history because of an argument between my parents was born in the eighties and once again today: scholar of the letters claims that the lexicon of a farmer, one of the famous old days, is much richer than that of an engineer today (you know who the letter and who was the engineer).
The question whether the statement is true or false still creates divisions between the world of letters and numbers (just kidding), however I agree.
I think the wealth of results has a broad vocabulary of the peasant who has his own way to live and work, the breadth of situations that every day is faced with, that being a farmer in the round does not include only the sphere of agriculture (without detracting from the scientific terms), mainly due to the fact that any peasant of ancient times lived and worked in the network, certainly more than just working to the fullest and sectors. [I know, I know, I wrote "network" and refer to this in everything I wrote on this blog and write about and also, of course, I connect with all the work last year in particular Article. ]
Now let's get back to us: the lexicon of the doctor is bound to be enormous and varied because of the field of study and work = man, but this vocabulary (and this goes up to my eyes every page of anatomy) is not a useful tool to network, because it is not understandable to the patient despite the words that refer to him is not able to understand them, at least in a immediadiata. In other words: the lexicon is important for description and reasoning from the perspective of those who have studied, but not that of the connections that is used to esssere. And at this point I quote the old man who wanted to explain Einstein's relativity to his grandmother, and concludes with: I think any patient will find that stupid to fully penetrate the subclavian artery in the axillary channel since both are parts of the same thing.
exist in the final average stress?
.. the only stress is that I have to return to school, kisses from Biomedical.
0 comments:
Post a Comment